RAW EXTRA LARGE ARGENTINE RED WILD SHRIMP vs PUBHOUSE BATTERED ALASKA COD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RAW EXTRA LARGE ARGENTINE RED WILD SHRIMP wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
RAW EXTRA LARGE ARGENTINE RED WILD SHRIMP: 6
vs
PUBHOUSE BATTERED ALASKA COD: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RAW EXTRA LARGE ARGENTINE RED WILD SHRIMP | PUBHOUSE BATTERED ALASKA COD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 80 cal | 194 cal | |
| Protein | 17.7 g | 11.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 19.4 g | |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 8.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RAW EXTRA LARGE ARGENTINE RED WILD SHRIMP | PUBHOUSE BATTERED ALASKA COD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 60 MG | 21 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 291 MG | 211 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 230 MG | 520 MG |