RANDALL vs REFRIED PINTO BEANS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANDALL wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
RANDALL: 6
vs
REFRIED PINTO BEANS: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANDALL | REFRIED PINTO BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 97 cal | 106 cal | |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 17.7 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 4.4 g | |
| Fiber | 5.3 g | 4.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANDALL | REFRIED PINTO BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANDALL | REFRIED PINTO BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 53 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 301 MG | 389 MG |