RANCH PLANT-BASED DRESSING & DIP vs BACON CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON CAESAR DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
RANCH PLANT-BASED DRESSING & DIP: 3
vs
BACON CAESAR DRESSING: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH PLANT-BASED DRESSING & DIP | BACON CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 533 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fat | 43.3 g | 56.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH PLANT-BASED DRESSING & DIP | BACON CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH PLANT-BASED DRESSING & DIP | BACON CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 33 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 567 MG | 733 MG |