RANCH DRESSING vs PORTMANN'S
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH DRESSING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
RANCH DRESSING: 4
vs
PORTMANN'S: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH DRESSING | PORTMANN'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 367 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fat | 40 g | 35.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH DRESSING | PORTMANN'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH DRESSING | PORTMANN'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 143 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 667 MG | 482 MG |