RANCH DRESSING vs GARDEN RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH DRESSING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
RANCH DRESSING: 4
vs
GARDEN RANCH DRESSING: 0
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH DRESSING | GARDEN RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 233 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 33.3 g | |
| Fat | 20 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH DRESSING | GARDEN RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH DRESSING | GARDEN RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 933 MG | 600 MG |