RANCH DRESSING vs MILD DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MILD DRESSING wins in 3 out of 12 nutrient categories
RANCH DRESSING: 2
vs
MILD DRESSING: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH DRESSING | MILD DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 43.3 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH DRESSING | MILD DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 16 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH DRESSING | MILD DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 833 MG | 200 MG |