RANCH DRESSING vs CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH DRESSING wins in 2 out of 12 nutrient categories
RANCH DRESSING: 2
vs
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 1
(9 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 433 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 46.7 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folate, total | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 50 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 867 MG | 867 MG | Tie |