RANCH DRESSING vs LIGHT CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
RANCH DRESSING: 4
vs
LIGHT CAESAR DRESSING: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH DRESSING | LIGHT CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 233 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fat | 23.3 g | 26.7 g | |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH DRESSING | LIGHT CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH DRESSING | LIGHT CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 933 MG | 600 MG |