RANCH DRESSING vs CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
RANCH DRESSING: 0
vs
CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH DRESSING | CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 367 cal | 83 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 10 g | 10 g | Tie |
| Fat | 36.7 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH DRESSING | CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH DRESSING | CLASSIC CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 17 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,000 MG | 1,000 MG | Tie |