RANCH DRESSING vs LIGHT CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
RANCH DRESSING: 3
vs
LIGHT CAESAR DRESSING: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH DRESSING | LIGHT CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 258 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 6.5 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 22.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH DRESSING | LIGHT CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH DRESSING | LIGHT CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 800 MG | 1,194 MG |