RANCH DRESSING vs CHEDDAR BACON RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH DRESSING wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
RANCH DRESSING: 6
vs
CHEDDAR BACON RANCH DRESSING: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH DRESSING | CHEDDAR BACON RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 433 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 20 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 36.7 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fiber | 10 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH DRESSING | CHEDDAR BACON RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH DRESSING | CHEDDAR BACON RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 33 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 700 MG | 867 MG |