RANCH DRESSING vs COLESLAW DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH DRESSING wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
RANCH DRESSING: 5
vs
COLESLAW DRESSING: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 433 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fat | 43.3 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 10 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 83 MG | 33 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,100 MG | 200 MG |