RANCH DRESSING vs WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
RANCH DRESSING: 4
vs
WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH DRESSING | WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 310 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 13.8 g | |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 31.0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH DRESSING | WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH DRESSING | WHITE BALSAMIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 33 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 63 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 833 MG | 759 MG |