RANCH DRESSING vs CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAESAR DRESSING wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
RANCH DRESSING: 1
vs
CAESAR DRESSING: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fat | 33.3 g | 26.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH DRESSING | CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 800 MG | 633 MG |