RANCH DRESSING vs PARMESAN RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH DRESSING wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
RANCH DRESSING: 3
vs
PARMESAN RANCH DRESSING: 1
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH DRESSING | PARMESAN RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 267 cal | 517 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 10 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fat | 23.3 g | 55.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH DRESSING | PARMESAN RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH DRESSING | PARMESAN RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 967 MG | 862 MG |