RANCH DRESSING vs BETTY CROCKER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH DRESSING wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
RANCH DRESSING: 5
vs
BETTY CROCKER: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH DRESSING | BETTY CROCKER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 83 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 42.9 g | |
| Carbs | 20 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 14.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 14.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH DRESSING | BETTY CROCKER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH DRESSING | BETTY CROCKER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 5.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 83 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,033 MG | 1,643 MG |