RANCH DRESSING vs CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
RANCH DRESSING: 1
vs
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 5
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RANCH DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 433 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fat | 53.6 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RANCH DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RANCH DRESSING | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 67 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 964 MG | 900 MG |