PRICKLY DRESSING vs GARDEN RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GARDEN RANCH DRESSING wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
PRICKLY DRESSING: 3
vs
GARDEN RANCH DRESSING: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PRICKLY DRESSING | GARDEN RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 54 cal | 607 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 14.3 g | 14.3 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 57.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PRICKLY DRESSING | GARDEN RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 12.9 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PRICKLY DRESSING | GARDEN RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 107 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 5.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 536 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 536 MG |