PREMIUM OLD FASHIONED BUN-LENGTH BEEF FRANKS vs CHICKEN MARSALA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN MARSALA wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
PREMIUM OLD FASHIONED BUN-LENGTH BEEF FRANKS: 3
vs
CHICKEN MARSALA: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PREMIUM OLD FASHIONED BUN-LENGTH BEEF FRANKS | CHICKEN MARSALA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 311 cal | 121 cal | |
| Protein | 12.2 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 4.1 g | 4.3 g | |
| Fat | 27.0 g | 5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PREMIUM OLD FASHIONED BUN-LENGTH BEEF FRANKS | CHICKEN MARSALA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PREMIUM OLD FASHIONED BUN-LENGTH BEEF FRANKS | CHICKEN MARSALA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 6 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.2 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 44 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,014 MG | 271 MG |