PORK TENDERLOIN vs FULLY COOKED BEEF POT ROAST WITH GRAVY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PORK TENDERLOIN wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
PORK TENDERLOIN: 4
vs
FULLY COOKED BEEF POT ROAST WITH GRAVY: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PORK TENDERLOIN | FULLY COOKED BEEF POT ROAST WITH GRAVY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 115 cal | 114 cal | |
| Protein | 19.5 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 1.2 g | 2.1 g | |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PORK TENDERLOIN | FULLY COOKED BEEF POT ROAST WITH GRAVY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PORK TENDERLOIN | FULLY COOKED BEEF POT ROAST WITH GRAVY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 29 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 460 MG | 300 MG |