Pork Shoulder Picnic vs BEEF HANGING TENDER STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BEEF HANGING TENDER STEAK wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
Pork Shoulder Picnic: 2
vs
BEEF HANGING TENDER STEAK: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | Pork Shoulder Picnic | BEEF HANGING TENDER STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 152 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 23.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 6.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | Pork Shoulder Picnic | BEEF HANGING TENDER STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | Pork Shoulder Picnic | BEEF HANGING TENDER STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 29 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 348 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 58 MG |