Pork Hocks MBG#417B vs Pork Ham Trim 90%
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
Pork Hocks MBG#417B wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
Pork Hocks MBG#417B: 4
vs
Pork Ham Trim 90%: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | Pork Hocks MBG#417B | Pork Ham Trim 90% | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 214 cal | 0 cal | |
| Protein | 23.2 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 12.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | Pork Hocks MBG#417B | Pork Ham Trim 90% | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | Pork Hocks MBG#417B | Pork Ham Trim 90% | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 134 MG | 0 MG |