PORK HOCKS BOX MBG#417B vs Pork Backribs 2.5/Down MBG#422
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PORK HOCKS BOX MBG#417B wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
PORK HOCKS BOX MBG#417B: 4
vs
Pork Backribs 2.5/Down MBG#422: 0
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PORK HOCKS BOX MBG#417B | Pork Backribs 2.5/Down MBG#422 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 116 cal | 205 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 17.0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 3.1 g | 22.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PORK HOCKS BOX MBG#417B | Pork Backribs 2.5/Down MBG#422 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PORK HOCKS BOX MBG#417B | Pork Backribs 2.5/Down MBG#422 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.6 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 89 MG | 62 MG |