Pork Ham Trim 90% vs Pork Back Rib 2.25 down
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
Pork Back Rib 2.25 down wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
Pork Ham Trim 90%: 2
vs
Pork Back Rib 2.25 down: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | Pork Ham Trim 90% | Pork Back Rib 2.25 down | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 268 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 17.0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 22.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | Pork Ham Trim 90% | Pork Back Rib 2.25 down | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | Pork Ham Trim 90% | Pork Back Rib 2.25 down | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 62 MG |