Pork Ham Knuckle vs BEEF PORTERHOUSE CH 18 OZ
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
Pork Ham Knuckle wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
Pork Ham Knuckle: 3
vs
BEEF PORTERHOUSE CH 18 OZ: 2
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | Pork Ham Knuckle | BEEF PORTERHOUSE CH 18 OZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 116 cal | 219 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 28.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 3.1 g | 10.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | Pork Ham Knuckle | BEEF PORTERHOUSE CH 18 OZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | Pork Ham Knuckle | BEEF PORTERHOUSE CH 18 OZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 2.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 89 MG | 67 MG |