Pork Ham Inner Shank vs Pork Back Rib 3.25 down
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
Pork Ham Inner Shank wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
Pork Ham Inner Shank: 3
vs
Pork Back Rib 3.25 down: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | Pork Ham Inner Shank | Pork Back Rib 3.25 down | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 196 cal | 0 cal | |
| Protein | 19.6 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 11.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | Pork Ham Inner Shank | Pork Back Rib 3.25 down | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | Pork Ham Inner Shank | Pork Back Rib 3.25 down | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 85 MG | 0 MG |