POLE & LINE vs MACKEREL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MACKEREL wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
POLE & LINE: 3
vs
MACKEREL: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | POLE & LINE | MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 116 cal | 143 cal | |
| Protein | 26.8 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | POLE & LINE | MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | POLE & LINE | MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 446 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 339 MG | 500 MG |