POCKY CHOCOLATE COVERED BISCUIT STICKS vs KIPFERL BISCUITS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
POCKY CHOCOLATE COVERED BISCUIT STICKS: 4
vs
KIPFERL BISCUITS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | POCKY CHOCOLATE COVERED BISCUIT STICKS | KIPFERL BISCUITS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 541 cal | 543 cal | |
| Protein | 10.8 g | 8.6 g | |
| Carbs | 54.1 g | 57.1 g | |
| Fat | 32.4 g | 31.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | POCKY CHOCOLATE COVERED BISCUIT STICKS | KIPFERL BISCUITS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | POCKY CHOCOLATE COVERED BISCUIT STICKS | KIPFERL BISCUITS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 57 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 162 MG | 57 MG |