PLANT-BASED CHOPPED CHICK'N vs DRY SALTED SLICED FATBACK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PLANT-BASED CHOPPED CHICK'N wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
PLANT-BASED CHOPPED CHICK'N: 7
vs
DRY SALTED SLICED FATBACK: 2
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PLANT-BASED CHOPPED CHICK'N | DRY SALTED SLICED FATBACK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 118 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 16.5 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 64.3 g | |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PLANT-BASED CHOPPED CHICK'N | DRY SALTED SLICED FATBACK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 482 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 447 MG | 3,357 MG |