PINTO BEANS vs LOW SODIUM CANNELLINI BEANS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LOW SODIUM CANNELLINI BEANS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
PINTO BEANS: 2
vs
LOW SODIUM CANNELLINI BEANS: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PINTO BEANS | LOW SODIUM CANNELLINI BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 85 cal | 85 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 4.6 g | 6.2 g | |
| Carbs | 15.4 g | 15.4 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 3.8 g | 6.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PINTO BEANS | LOW SODIUM CANNELLINI BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PINTO BEANS | LOW SODIUM CANNELLINI BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 46 MG | 38 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 2.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 354 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 269 MG | 69 MG |