PETIT BISCUIT vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PETIT BISCUIT wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
PETIT BISCUIT: 4
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PETIT BISCUIT | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 420 cal | 396 cal | |
| Protein | 9.2 g | 4.2 g | |
| Carbs | 72 g | 58.3 g | |
| Fat | 9.5 g | 14.6 g | |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | 2.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PETIT BISCUIT | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PETIT BISCUIT | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 83 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 700 MG | 312 MG |