PEPPERMINT MINI CANDY CANES vs VALENTINE MARSHMALLOW
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
VALENTINE MARSHMALLOW wins in 3 out of 12 nutrient categories
PEPPERMINT MINI CANDY CANES: 1
vs
VALENTINE MARSHMALLOW: 3
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PEPPERMINT MINI CANDY CANES | VALENTINE MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 385 cal | 381 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 4.8 g | |
| Carbs | 100 g | 92.9 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PEPPERMINT MINI CANDY CANES | VALENTINE MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PEPPERMINT MINI CANDY CANES | VALENTINE MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 115 MG | 12 MG |