PART SKIM RICOTTA vs SHARP CHEDDAR CRACKER CUTS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SHARP CHEDDAR CRACKER CUTS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
PART SKIM RICOTTA: 2
vs
SHARP CHEDDAR CRACKER CUTS: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PART SKIM RICOTTA | SHARP CHEDDAR CRACKER CUTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 145 cal | 393 cal | |
| Protein | 9.7 g | 25 g | |
| Carbs | 3.2 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 9.7 g | 32.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PART SKIM RICOTTA | SHARP CHEDDAR CRACKER CUTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | PART SKIM RICOTTA | SHARP CHEDDAR CRACKER CUTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 242 MG | 714 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 81 MG | 643 MG |