PANAPESCA vs LARGE COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PANAPESCA wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
PANAPESCA: 5
vs
LARGE COOKED SHRIMP: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PANAPESCA | LARGE COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 52 cal | 54 cal | |
| Protein | 11 g | 13.4 g | |
| Carbs | 1 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PANAPESCA | LARGE COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.2 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PANAPESCA | LARGE COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 40 MG | 27 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 125 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 568 MG | 321 MG |