PANAPESCA vs EXTRA LARGE COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PANAPESCA wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
PANAPESCA: 5
vs
EXTRA LARGE COOKED SHRIMP: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PANAPESCA | EXTRA LARGE COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 52 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 11 g | 15.3 g | |
| Carbs | 1 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PANAPESCA | EXTRA LARGE COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.2 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PANAPESCA | EXTRA LARGE COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 40 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 568 MG | 518 MG |