PANAPESCA vs BLACK TIGER SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PANAPESCA wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
PANAPESCA: 5
vs
BLACK TIGER SHRIMP: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | PANAPESCA | BLACK TIGER SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 178 cal | 106 cal | |
| Protein | 24 g | 20.4 g | |
| Carbs | 6 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fat | 2 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | PANAPESCA | BLACK TIGER SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 18 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | PANAPESCA | BLACK TIGER SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 120 MG | 53 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 13.7 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 440 MG | 230 MG |