ORIGINAL QUINOA CURLS vs KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL QUINOA CURLS wins in 9 out of 11 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL QUINOA CURLS: 9
vs
KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS: 1
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL QUINOA CURLS | KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 478 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 17.4 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 47.8 g | 57.1 g | |
| Fat | 21.7 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 4.3 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL QUINOA CURLS | KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 21.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL QUINOA CURLS | KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 43 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.4 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 378 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,043 MG | 1,000 MG |