ORIGINAL POTATO CHIPS vs UMAMI BAKED CHICKPEA THINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UMAMI BAKED CHICKPEA THINS wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL POTATO CHIPS: 3
vs
UMAMI BAKED CHICKPEA THINS: 7
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL POTATO CHIPS | UMAMI BAKED CHICKPEA THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 493 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 7.0 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 59.9 g | 60.7 g | |
| Fat | 24.7 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL POTATO CHIPS | UMAMI BAKED CHICKPEA THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 52.8 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL POTATO CHIPS | UMAMI BAKED CHICKPEA THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 571 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 370 MG | 1,179 MG |