ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES vs ICED CINNAMON ROLLS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ICED CINNAMON ROLLS wins in 6 out of 13 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES: 5
vs
ICED CINNAMON ROLLS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES | ICED CINNAMON ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 372 cal | |
| Protein | 5 g | 5.1 g | |
| Carbs | 75 g | 55.1 g | |
| Fat | 10 g | 15.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES | ICED CINNAMON ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folate, total | 300 UG | 0 UG | |
| Niacin | 8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0.9 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES | ICED CINNAMON ROLLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 154 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 500 MG | 436 MG |