ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW MINI SQUARES vs FIG MINI ROLLS STRUDEL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 13 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW MINI SQUARES: 5
vs
FIG MINI ROLLS STRUDEL: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW MINI SQUARES | FIG MINI ROLLS STRUDEL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 409 cal | 383 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 5 g | |
| Carbs | 72.7 g | 66.7 g | |
| Fat | 9.1 g | 10 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW MINI SQUARES | FIG MINI ROLLS STRUDEL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 7.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 5 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW MINI SQUARES | FIG MINI ROLLS STRUDEL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 455 MG | 150 MG |