ORIGINAL CRESCENT ROLLS vs LITEFLUFF
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LITEFLUFF wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL CRESCENT ROLLS: 2
vs
LITEFLUFF: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL CRESCENT ROLLS | LITEFLUFF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 357 cal | 246 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 6.2 g | |
| Carbs | 42.9 g | 46.2 g | |
| Fat | 17.9 g | 2.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL CRESCENT ROLLS | LITEFLUFF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 5.5 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL CRESCENT ROLLS | LITEFLUFF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 2.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 750 MG | 754 MG |