ORIGINAL COOKED HAM vs UNCURED CORNED BEEF
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNCURED CORNED BEEF wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL COOKED HAM: 3
vs
UNCURED CORNED BEEF: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL COOKED HAM | UNCURED CORNED BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 108 cal | 123 cal | |
| Protein | 13.5 g | 21.1 g | |
| Carbs | 5.4 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL COOKED HAM | UNCURED CORNED BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL COOKED HAM | UNCURED CORNED BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,162 MG | 1,123 MG |