ORIGINAL BALSAMIC GLACE vs COOKING WINE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKING WINE wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL BALSAMIC GLACE: 0
vs
COOKING WINE: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL BALSAMIC GLACE | COOKING WINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 300 cal | 83 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 73.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL BALSAMIC GLACE | COOKING WINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL BALSAMIC GLACE | COOKING WINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 67 MG | 633 MG |