ORIGINAL 100% REAL THICK CUT BACON vs COOKED HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
ORIGINAL 100% REAL THICK CUT BACON: 2
vs
COOKED HAM: 2
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORIGINAL 100% REAL THICK CUT BACON | COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 0 cal | |
| Protein | 35.7 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORIGINAL 100% REAL THICK CUT BACON | COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORIGINAL 100% REAL THICK CUT BACON | COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 2,071 MG | 0 MG |