ORGANIC DRESSING vs CHEDDAR BACON RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORGANIC DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
ORGANIC DRESSING: 3
vs
CHEDDAR BACON RANCH DRESSING: 0
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORGANIC DRESSING | CHEDDAR BACON RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 433 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 43.3 g | 43.3 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ORGANIC DRESSING | CHEDDAR BACON RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORGANIC DRESSING | CHEDDAR BACON RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 833 MG | 800 MG |