ORGANIC COLESLAW DRESSING vs WHIPPED DRESSING SQUEEZABLE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHIPPED DRESSING SQUEEZABLE wins in 4 out of 7 nutrient categories
ORGANIC COLESLAW DRESSING: 0
vs
WHIPPED DRESSING SQUEEZABLE: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ORGANIC COLESLAW DRESSING | WHIPPED DRESSING SQUEEZABLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 387 cal | 286 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 19.4 g | 14.3 g | |
| Fat | 35.5 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ORGANIC COLESLAW DRESSING | WHIPPED DRESSING SQUEEZABLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium, Na | 645 MG | 714 MG |