OLD FASHIONED SUGAR CONES vs SESMARK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
OLD FASHIONED SUGAR CONES wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
OLD FASHIONED SUGAR CONES: 5
vs
SESMARK: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | OLD FASHIONED SUGAR CONES | SESMARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 385 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 92.3 g | 83.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | OLD FASHIONED SUGAR CONES | SESMARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | OLD FASHIONED SUGAR CONES | SESMARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 154 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 154 MG | 200 MG |