NO SALT ADDED SKIPJACK WILD TUNA vs SOLID WHITE ALBACORE WILD CAUGHT TUNA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOLID WHITE ALBACORE WILD CAUGHT TUNA wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
NO SALT ADDED SKIPJACK WILD TUNA: 2
vs
SOLID WHITE ALBACORE WILD CAUGHT TUNA: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NO SALT ADDED SKIPJACK WILD TUNA | SOLID WHITE ALBACORE WILD CAUGHT TUNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 106 cal | 111 cal | |
| Protein | 24.7 g | 26.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NO SALT ADDED SKIPJACK WILD TUNA | SOLID WHITE ALBACORE WILD CAUGHT TUNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NO SALT ADDED SKIPJACK WILD TUNA | SOLID WHITE ALBACORE WILD CAUGHT TUNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 231 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 65 MG | 241 MG |