NATURAL UNCURED BLACK FOREST HAM vs ORIGINAL COOKED CORNED BEEF
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
NATURAL UNCURED BLACK FOREST HAM: 3
vs
ORIGINAL COOKED CORNED BEEF: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NATURAL UNCURED BLACK FOREST HAM | ORIGINAL COOKED CORNED BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 111 cal | 143 cal | |
| Protein | 20.4 g | 25 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NATURAL UNCURED BLACK FOREST HAM | ORIGINAL COOKED CORNED BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | NATURAL UNCURED BLACK FOREST HAM | ORIGINAL COOKED CORNED BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 704 MG | 893 MG |