NATURAL UNCURED BEEF FRANKS vs SMOKED KIELBASA KING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NATURAL UNCURED BEEF FRANKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
NATURAL UNCURED BEEF FRANKS: 5
vs
SMOKED KIELBASA KING: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | NATURAL UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | SMOKED KIELBASA KING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 254 cal | 268 cal | |
| Protein | 14.1 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 2.8 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 19.7 g | 19.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | NATURAL UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | SMOKED KIELBASA KING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 27 MG | 21.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | NATURAL UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | SMOKED KIELBASA KING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 28 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 746 MG | 1,089 MG |